Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- c:c_const_declaration [2021/10/04 21:24] – [Passing a parameter to a function by reference] peter
+++ c:c_const_declaration [2023/06/26 07:24] (current) – [Messier Still - in the Object Oriented Programming] peter
@@ Line 194: / Line 194: @@
   * This is messy because it is essentially making an in-only variable passing method from a both-ways variable passing method which was itself made from an in-only variable passing method just to trick the compiler into doing some optimization.
-  * Ideally, the programmer should not need control this detail of specifying exactly how variables are passed, just say which direction the information goes and leave the compiler to optimize it automatically, but C was designed for raw low-level programming on far less powerful computers than are standard these days so the programmer has to do it explicitly.
+  * Ideally, the programmer should not need to control this detail of specifying exactly how variables are passed, just say which direction the information goes and leave the compiler to optimize it automatically, but C was designed for raw low-level programming on far less powerful computers than are standard these days so the programmer has to do it explicitly.
 ----
@@ Line 233: / Line 233: @@
 </code>
-  * which will ban Method1 in Class2 from being anything which can attempt to alter any member variables in the object.
+  * which will ban Method1 in Class2 from doing anything which can attempt to alter any member variables in the object.
 Of course one sometimes needs to combine some of these different uses of ‘const’ which can get confusing as in:
@@ Line 269: / Line 269: @@
 http://duramecho.com/ComputerInformation/WhyHowCppConst.html
+https://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial/const_correctness.html